Executive summary

This matched-pair cohort study from the Heidelberg group evaluated IMPT for 25 patients with uterine cervical (n = 8) or endometrial cancer (n = 17), comparing to IMRT (n=25) in sparing of the pelvic bone marrow and thus reduction of hematotoxicity. In the IMPT group, integral dose to the pelvic skeleton was significantly lower (23.4GyRBE vs 34.3Gy; p < 0.001). Hematotoxicity was significantly more common in the IMRT group (80% vs 32%; p = 0009), especially hematotoxicity ≥ CTCAE II (36% vs 8%; p = 0.037). No patient in the IMPT group experienced hematotoxicity > CTCAE II. In the IMPT cohort, 32% of patients experienced sacral insufficiency fracture (SIF), which appeared similar to reported rates for IMRT in the literature.

Top cancer treatments